Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs N. Hibino

Anna-Lena Friedsam

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.63m

193

C. Rank

174

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$1.6M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Nao Hibino

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.63m

193

C. Rank

174

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$1.6M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Hibino

They have played 3 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Nao Hibino winning 1. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Nao Hibino was at the French Open - Paris, 29-05-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Friedsam	1
Hibino	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) French Open - Paris(05-29-23)

Stats

Anna-Lena Friedsam

Nao Hibino

A. Friedsam vs N. Hibino H2H Profile

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Hibino
$1,078,782	Career Prize Money	$1,614,842
59.94% (398-266)	Career Total W/L	54.48% (407-340)
1	Clay	0
15	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-2)	YTD Win/Loss	22.22% (2-7)

A. Friedsam vs N. Hibino Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 42.62% of points on their second serve, while Nao Hibino has won 39.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Friedsam, in recent form, has won 50.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nao Hibino has won 48.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.78% and 36.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Friedsam has saved 54.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nao Hibino has saved 48.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 63.79% of matches played (W/L 37/21), with Nao Hibino winning 50.00% (W/L 26/26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 122/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/19). Nao Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 292/223), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 55/66).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/14), where as Nao Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 1 times and Nao Hibino being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Nao Hibino winning 1.
The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Nao Hibino was at the French Open - Paris, 29-05-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.36 while Nao Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 238.83.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nao Hibino has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Friedsam has converted 39.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nao Hibino has converted 45.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Nao Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Friedsam vs N. Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Hibino
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	13
6	Aces (Total)	1
12	Total Double Faults	5
2:30:0	Average Match Time	2:30:0
58% (66/113)	1st Serve %	69% (77/111)
67% (44/66)	1st Serve Win %	61% (47/77)
45% (21/47)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (14/34)
26% (5/19)	Break Pts Won %	31% (4/13)
45% (50/111)	Return Points Win %	42% (48/113)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F - 10-11-2025
Rubber 1 Jeline VandrommeJ. Vandromme	L	7-6(0) 2-6 6-3	Stats
Austin 125 - Austin - 03-11-2025
R1 Iva JovicI. Jovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Torneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025
QF Oksana SelekhmetevaO. Selekhmeteva	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
R2 Linda KlimovicovaL. Klimovicova	W	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
R1 Andrea Lazaro GarciaA. Lazaro	W	2-6 7-6(4) 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Hibino Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W100 Takasaki - 17-11-2025
QF Yeon Woo KuY. Woo	L	3-6 7-5 7-5	Stats
R2 Eri ShimizuE. Shimizu	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Viktoria MorvayovaV. Morvayova	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
Chennai Open - Chennai - 27-10-2025
R1 Mia PohankovaM. Pohankova	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo - 20-10-2025
Q1 Cristina BucsaC. Bucsa	L	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

A. Friedsam vs N. Hibino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Friedsam	Stats	N. Hibino
59.94% (398/266)	YTD Win/Loss	54.48% (407/340)
57.98% (897/650)	Sets Win/Loss	53.01% (908/805)
53.48% (7684/6683)	Games Win/Loss	51.53% (8064/7585)
55.67% (108/86)	Hard Win/Loss	56.70% (292/223)
59.66% (139/94)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (55/66)
66.83% (135/67)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.78% (26/19)
45.71% (16/19)	Grass Win/Loss	51.52% (34/32)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.13
1583	Aces Total	1023
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.21
1702	Total Double Faults	1612
1:11:45	Average Match Time	1:12:54
466.61	Average Opponent Rank	485.97
65% (22459/34590)	1st Serve %	65% (25797/39512)
65% (14646/22459)	1st Serve Win %	61% (15626/25797)
46% (5576/12129)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (6358/13712)
45% (1711/3768)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (2294/4825)
43% (14589/34179)	Return Points Win %	45% (17789/39756)
36.84% (21/36)	Slam W/L	47.56% (39/43)
33.33% (10/20)	Masters W/L	42.42% (28/38)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	56.25% (9/7)
52.88% (101/90)	Main Tour W/L	48.82% (103/108)
67.85% (211/100)	Challenger W/L	59.48% (204/139)
76.81% (53/16)	Futures W/L	82.76% (24/5)
60% (389/650)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (400/735)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
52% (91/176)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (87/152)
54% (123/229)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (125/223)
85% (391/334)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (385/331)
14% (391/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (385/52)
23% (273/63)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (362/73)